Claims

PBL is not statistically superior to conventional teaching for problem-solving in first-year students (p = 0.47), with the pooled effect tending toward conventional teaching

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In two pooled studies with considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 86%), the overall random-effects result for problem-solving leaned toward conventional teaching but was not statistically significant. → Manuaba Ida Bagus Amertha Putra 2022

Evidence

Manuaba Ida Bagus Amertha Putra 2022

Manuaba Ida Bagus Amertha Putra, No Yi, Wu Chien-Chih. (2022). The effectiveness of problem based learning in improving critical thinking, problem-solving and self-directed learning in first-year medical students: A meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277339

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1

Meta-analysis of two studies of the problem-solving aspect between PBL and conventional learning methods, analyzed with random effects; heterogeneity was I2 = 86% (considerable). The pooled result was "more toward the conventional teaching" but not statistically significant.

"It is more toward the conventional teaching for enhancing problem-solving skills, but it was not statistically significant (Fig 4)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.