Claims

One study found significantly higher patient breastfeeding rates among physicians who participated in case-based PBL training

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Patients of physicians who attended the case-based intervention showed significantly higher breastfeeding rates than patients at a similar program without the training. → Clemens Megan 2026

Evidence

Clemens Megan 2026

Clemens Megan, Boparai Josheil Kaur, Dawe Russell, Avery Susan. (2026). Problem-based and related learning approaches in family medicine residency: a scoping review of four countries. Canadian Medical Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.81284

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review reports the single Level 4 study (Holmes et al.), a comparison between a family medicine program whose residents received a case-based breastfeeding seminar and a similar program without it: breastfeeding rates of 26% vs. 11% at four months and 30% vs. 9% at six months, p < 0.001. Only a p-value is printed.

"Patients whose physicians attended the intervention, which included case-based learning, showed significantly higher breastfeeding rates (p < 0.001) compared to learners at a similar program without this training (26% vs. 11% at four months and 30% vs. 9% at six months)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.