Claims

PBL advantage on skill scores holds in the five-year school-system subgroup (SMD = 1.08)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i2 Stratified analysis of 5 five-year-system studies found significantly higher skill scores for PBL (SMD = 1.08, 95%CI 0.47–1.69). → Wang 2016

Evidence

Wang 2016

Wang, J., Xu, Y., Liu, X., Xiong, W., Xie, J., & Zhao, J. (2016). Assessing the effectiveness of problem-based learning in physical diagnostics education in China: a meta-analysis. Scientific Reports. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5093758/

q2 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r2

Stratified random-effects analysis pooling 5 studies whose target population were all five-year system students (I2 = 92%) found "a statistically significant difference was also observed in skill scores (SMD = 1.08, 95%CI [0.47, 1.69], P = 0.0006) in favor of PBL".

"A statistically significant difference was also observed in skill scores (SMD = 1.08, 95%CI [0.47, 1.69], P = 0.0006) in favor of PBL, compared with the traditional teaching."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.