Claims

Problem-based learning shows a small but significant pooled advantage over lecture-based learning in dental education (SMD = 0.33)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q4 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i1 PBL subgroup analysis showed a significant but small effect versus LBL (SMD = 0.33, 95% CI 0.01-0.65, P = .045). → Pang Xuefei 2024

Evidence

Pang Xuefei 2024

Pang Xuefei, Li Ling, Liu Xu, Wang Yan, Yang Bo. (2024). Application of Emerging Teaching Models in Dental Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Dental Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2024.05.016

q4 · i1 · quant-synthesis · r3

Subgroup analysis by teaching method (Figure 3B) in the meta-analysis; PBL appeared as the experimental method in 6 studies. The pooled PBL effect was significant at P = .045 with a confidence interval (0.01-0.65) barely excluding zero.

"PBL (SMD = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.01-0.65, P = .045) and FC (SMD = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.31-0.69, P < .001) had significantly higher teaching effects than traditional teaching method LBL"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.