Subgroup analyses by intervention duration and region reduce heterogeneity only for interventions longer than six months and Western countries, without significant PBL differences in any subgroup¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Subgroup analysis found low heterogeneity for interventions longer than six months and Western-country comparisons (I2 = 0%), but high heterogeneity for shorter interventions (I2 = 96%) and Asian countries (I2 = 95%), with no statistical difference between PBL and conventional methods in any subgroup. → Manuaba Ida Bagus Amertha Putra 2022
Evidence¶
Manuaba Ida Bagus Amertha Putra 2022¶
Manuaba Ida Bagus Amertha Putra, No Yi, Wu Chien-Chih. (2022). The effectiveness of problem based learning in improving critical thinking, problem-solving and self-directed learning in first-year medical students: A meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277339
q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1
Subgroup analysis of critical thinking/knowledge studies regrouped by intervention duration (≤ 6 months vs > 6 months) and countries (Asia vs. western), assessed with random- and fixed-effect models. Heterogeneity fell to I2 = 0% only for >6 months and Western subgroups; no subgroup showed a significant PBL difference.
"The studies with the duration intervention at more than six months and learning method comparison in western countries subgroup were found to have low heterogeneity ((I2 = 0% (might not be important)). However, high heterogeneity scores were found in the studies with duration intervention less than six months (I2 = 96%) and learning method comparison in Asian countries subgroup (I2 = 95%)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- PBL shows no statistically significant advantage over conventional learning for critical thinking/knowledge in first-year medical students (p = 0.29) — related
- Meta-regression finds discipline, country, year, and learner identity do not significantly explain heterogeneity in TBL-versus-PBL effects — related
- Publication type, course type, educational level, and experimental duration did not significantly moderate the effect of context-based learning on academic achievement — related
- TBL effects on theoretical knowledge and practical skills are larger in interventions lasting more than 4 weeks — related
- Intervention duration significantly moderates Gen-AI's effect on HOT, with the strongest effects at 8–16 weeks (ES = 0.759) and weaker effects for shorter (0.494) and longer (0.372) interventions — related
- Subgroup results: CBL ranks best for clinical curricula and across educational backgrounds, while PBL ranks best for basic courses, developing countries, and operational skills — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.