Claims

PBL is superior to conventional instruction for long-term retention, according to a meta-synthesis of meta-analyses

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2009 · checked against its sources 2026-10-19 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Meta-analytic research synthesized qualitatively indicates PBL outperforms traditional instruction on long-term retention measures. → Strobel 2009

Evidence

Strobel 2009

Strobel, J., & van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL More Effective? A Meta-synthesis of Meta-analyses Comparing PBL to Conventional Classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1046

q2 · i? · qualitative · r?

A qualitative meta-synthesis of prior meta-analyses comparing PBL with traditional instruction. The synthesis reports that "PBL was superior when it comes to long-term retention"; no pooled effect size is printed in the available text.

"Findings indicated that PBL was superior when it comes to long-term retention, skill development and satisfaction of students and teachers"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id pbl-superior-long-term-retention
title PBL is superior to conventional instruction for long-term retention, according to a meta-synthesis of meta-analyses
description PBL is superior to conventional instruction for long-term retention, according to a meta-synthesis of meta-analyses
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2009
source_checked 2026-10-19
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — strobel-2009

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.