PCA metacognitive suggestions improve consensus reaching, task division and reciprocal interaction during collaboration¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i2 Visible PCA suggestions raised consensus reaching (η2p = 0.1289). → Hayashi 2020 q3 i1 PCA suggestions raised reciprocal interaction (η2p = 0.0586). → Hayashi 2020

Evidence¶

Hayashi 2020¶

Hayashi, Y. (2020). Gaze awareness and metacognitive suggestions by a pedagogical conversational agent: an experimental investigation on interventions to support collaborative learning process and performance. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09333-3

q3 · i2 · causal · r2

In the same 2×2 ANOVA of coded collaboration ratings, the PCA factor showed a significant main effect on consensus reaching, "F (1,76) = 11.244, p = 0.0012", with η2p = 0.1289; reciprocal interaction also showed a PCA main effect.

"Thus, the learners tended to reach consensus when they used the visible gaze (F (1,76) = 29.277, p = 0.0000,η2p = 0.2781) and the PCA (F (1,76) = 11.244, p = 0.0012, η2p = 0.1289)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Gaze feedback and PCA suggestions interact on proportional learning gains, with synergy favoring the visible-gaze/visible-agent condition — related
• Gaze feedback and PCA suggestions show no interaction effect on the collaborative process ratings — related
• Consensus reaching and task division together predict learning gains across conditions — related
• A successful coordination/high learning-gain correlation appears only for learners receiving both visible gaze feedback and PCA suggestions — related