Claims

Prior meta-analysis reports a pooled mean effect size of 0.21 SD on student achievement for mathematics and science teacher PD and curriculum improvement interventions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r? · q2 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i1 A prior meta-analysis by the same authors found a pooled mean effect size of 0.21 SD on student achievement. → Lynch 2025

Evidence

Lynch 2025

Lynch, K., Gonzalez, K., Hill, H., & Merritt, R. (2025). A Meta-Analysis of the Experimental Evidence Linking Mathematics and Science Professional Development Interventions to Teacher Knowledge, Classroom Instruction, and Student Achievement. AERA Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584251335302

q2 · i1 · quant-synthesis · r?

The review reports, citing its own prior work (Lynch et al., 2019), a pooled mean effect size of "0.21 SD" on student achievement for mathematics and science PD and curriculum improvement interventions — a small printed effect size.

"conducted a related meta-analysis of the student-level impacts of teacher professional development and curriculum improvement interventions in PK–12 mathematics and sci- ence, finding a pooled mean effect size on student achievement of 0.21 SD."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.