Pedagogical interventions and scaffolds increase learners' use of self-regulated reading strategies¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr2–r3·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? After an instructional unit, students used more self-regulated strategies such as questioning and evaluating while reading. → Hu 2017
q2 i? Students provided with conceptual scaffolds used more planning during hypermedia reading than unscaffolded students. → Hu 2017 (2)
Evidence¶
Hu 2017¶
Hu, Jingjing; Gao, Xuesong (Andy). (2017). Using think-aloud protocol in self-regulated reading research. Educational Research Review, v.22, pp. 181-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.004
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review reports, citing Rogers (1991), that an instructional unit with eight ninth-grade students involving peer discussion and reflection led to increased use of self-regulated reading strategies.
"The results showed that after participating in the instructional unit, students used more self-regulated strategies while reading, such as questionning and evaluating."
Hu 2017 (2)¶
Hu, Jingjing; Gao, Xuesong (Andy). (2017). Using think-aloud protocol in self-regulated reading research. Educational Research Review, v.22, pp. 181-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.004
q2 · i? · review · r2
The review reports, citing Moos and Azevedo (2008) with 37 participants, that conceptual scaffolds increased planning strategy use during hypermedia reading; tutor facilitation similarly increased monitoring and adaptive help seeking (Azevedo et al. 2008).
"Results indicated that students who were provided with conceptual scaffolds used more of planning during the hypermedia reading task than students who were not provided with the scaffolds."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Self-Regulation — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Self-questioning improves comprehension — related
- Reading Strategy Instruction Improves Comprehension — related
- Rule-triggered pedagogical agents increased SRL activities and learning outcomes relative to untriggered agents — related
- Strategy Instruction Improves Learning — a broader claim this one bears on
- Metacognitive prompts improve learning — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
pedagogy-increases-self-regulated-reading-strategies |
title |
Pedagogical interventions and scaffolds increase learners' use of self-regulated reading strategies |
description |
Pedagogical interventions and scaffolds increase learners' use of self-regulated reading strategies |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2017 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — hu-2017, hu-2017-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.