Claims

Peer-expert modeling videos interspersed with instructional guidance produce significant medium-to-large positive effects on IPS performance compared to practice-only groups

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Studies using peer-expert videos showing short fragments of each IPS process step, interspersed with reflective prompts or explicit instruction and followed by practice, showed a significant, medium to large, positive effect on IPS performance versus practice-only groups, persisting after one week; no standardized effect size is printed for this finding. → Boetje 2026 q2 i? Effects of non-expert (peer) models were inconsistent, ranging from no effect on IPS knowledge to a significant large effect on understanding IPS concepts, with limited comparability across operationalizations. → Boetje 2026 (2)

Evidence

Boetje 2026

Boetje, J., Sichterman, B., Van Ginkel, S., Smakman, M., & Versendaal, J. (2026). Design Principles for Developing Information Problem Solving Competence in Higher Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543251338057

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Narrative synthesis of controlled pretest-posttest studies using peer-expert modeling videos. The review reports "a significant, medium to large, positive effect on IPS performance" relative to practice-only groups, persisting in a delayed posttest after one week; no standardized effect size value is printed.

"Studies involving peer-expert videos—showing short fragments of each IPS process step, interspersed with reflective prompts (Frerejean et al., 2018) or explicit instruction (Mateos et al., 2018), and followed by practice—demonstrated a significant, medium to large, positive effect on IPS performance when compared to groups that only practiced"

Boetje 2026 (2)

Boetje, J., Sichterman, B., Van Ginkel, S., Smakman, M., & Versendaal, J. (2026). Design Principles for Developing Information Problem Solving Competence in Higher Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543251338057

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Narrative synthesis of studies using non-expert peer models. The review attributes mixed results to differing modeling techniques (comedy excerpts vs. live demonstrations) and unvalidated outcome measures, advising caution.

"The impact of non-expert models varied, showing either no effect on IPS knowledge (Hostetler & Luo, 2021) or a significant, large effect on understanding IPS concepts (Tewell, 2014)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id peer-expert-modeling-improves-ips-performance
title Peer-expert modeling videos interspersed with instructional guidance produce significant medium-to-large positive effects on IPS performance compared to practice-only groups
description Peer-expert modeling videos interspersed with instructional guidance produce significant medium-to-large positive effects on IPS performance compared to practice-only groups
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-20
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — boetje-2026, boetje-2026-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.