Peer review helped students notice their own mistakes through reviewing others' work¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q1
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? Students reported that reviewing other groups' work helped them spot mistakes they themselves had made but not noticed. → van den Berg 2024

Evidence¶

van den Berg 2024¶

van den Berg, C., & Bozalek, V. (2024). Design principles to develop digital innovation skills: a design-based research approach. Education Tech Research Dev, 72, 947–972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10308-y

q1 · i? · design · r3

Student quote from iteration 2 qualitative data on peer review and online feedback used to achieve access to expert performance (A3); after iteration 1 discomfort, more coaching and rubric guidance were added.

"What I learnt from the exercise was that one does not see their mistakes but quickly notices them in someone else."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The outside perspective of video-assisted debriefing helped participants observe teammates and see how individual actions related to team performance, though most participants focused mainly on themselves — related
• Children express metacognitive knowledge of self by identifying their own mistakes and weaknesses in academic working skills during measurement activities — related
• Critical constructive feedback is neglected at multiple, independently measurable processing stages — related
• Montessori maths materials embed error feedback through in-built control of error, e.g., the Spindle Box's fixed count of 55 spindles — related
• Classroom observations showed experimental students readily adopted the three approaches but still made mistakes with abstract concepts and problem decomposition — related
• During the cooperative learning program, students developed social and group-work skills, with high performers guiding teammates and low performers succeeding with peer help — related