Claims

Immersive multimedia learning with peer support significantly improves oral production in reading aloud across all rubric aspects compared with no peer support

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? First-year EFL students learning with immersive multimedia plus peer support scored significantly higher than students without peer support on pausing, phrasing, stress, intonation, rate, and integration in reading aloud (p < .05 for all aspects). → Muslem 2017

Evidence

Muslem 2017

Muslem, A., & Abbas, M. (2017). The Effectiveness of Immersive Multimedia Learning with Peer Support on English Speaking and Reading Aloud. International Journal of Instruction, 10(1). http://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2017_1_13.pdf

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental post-test study of 80 first-year Indonesian university EFL students in intact classes, 40 per condition, analyzed with one-way ANOVA. For example, reading pausing means were 7.15 with peer support versus 6.70 without, F(1,78) = 6.382, p = .014, showing "p < .05 for all the aspects".

"Students in the peer -support group reported higher mean scores for all dimensions of oral production and results of the ANOVA tests reported significant differences, i.e., that p < .05 for all the aspects."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.