Claims

Peer teaching produced significantly higher mathematics achievement than no peer teaching among low-scoring undergraduate female students in Oman

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Undergraduate female students taught with peer teaching scored significantly higher on the posttest Mathematics Achievement Test than control students (t(30)=2.667, p=0.012). → Abdelkarim 2016

Evidence

Abdelkarim 2016

Abdelkarim, R., & Abuiyada, R. (2016). The Effect of Peer Teaching on Mathematics Academic Achievement of the Undergraduate Students in Oman. International Education Studies, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n5p124

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Pretest-posttest control-experimental group experiment with 32 female Dhofar University students randomly assigned, all scoring 8-12 of 20 on the midterm. The peer-teaching group mean was "(6.6875)" versus "(4.5000)" for control on the 10-point MACT; the t-test was significant at p=0.012. No effect size is printed.

"Table 4 shows that “there is a significant difference in the means of the experimental group (M=6.69, SD=1.96) and the control group (M=4.50, SD=2.63) of the post- test; t(30)=2.667, p=0.012”."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.