Claims

Peer tutoring produced statistically significant post-test gains in non-verbal communication for children with ASD relative to a control group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? At post measurement, the experimental group's mean scores on the non-verbal communication scale significantly exceeded the control group's (Z = 2.635, p = 0.008). → Alshurman and Alsreaa 2015

Evidence

Alshurman and Alsreaa 2015

Wael Alshurman, Ihsani Alsreaa. (2015). The Efficiency of Peer Teaching of Developing Non Verbal Communication to Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.29. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1081260

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experiment with 10 children with ASD (5 per group) at a qualification center; Mann Whitney and Wilcoxon tests compared groups at post-test. The result was "in favor of experimental group", with Z = 2.635 and Sig 0.008 printed in Table (2).

"Table (2) showed statistically significant differen ces between mean scores of experimental and control group at post measurement on non – verbal communica tion scale and in favor of experimental group, sugg est ing the efficiency of training in peer tutoring for experimental group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.