Students assessed their own peers less critically than an unknown video presenter, consistent with possible friendship bias in authentic peer feedback¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Students generated more positive judgments at T2 (real peers) than at T1 (video presenter), which the authors interpret as assessing peers less critically. → Floris M. van Blankenstein 2019
Evidence¶
Floris M. van Blankenstein 2019¶
Floris M. van Blankenstein, Gabriela-Olivia Truțescu, Roeland M. van der Rijst, Nadira Saab. (2019). Immediate and delayed effects of a modeling example on the application of principles of good feedback practice: a quasi-experimental study. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09482-5
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Authors' interpretation of the descriptive comparison between the direct (video presenter) and delayed (real peers) measures in their quasi-experiment; no statistical test of the T1–T2 judgment difference is reported, so this is an untested descriptive pattern.
"Students generated more positive judgments at T2 than at T1, which shows that they assessed their own peers less critically than the presenter in the video at T1, whom they did not know personally"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The quality of feedback students give peers predicts gains in their own work, but no recorded study isolates a causal benefit of the assessor role — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
peers-assessed-less-critically-than-video-presenter |
title |
Students assessed their own peers less critically than an unknown video presenter, consistent with possible friendship bias in authentic peer feedback |
description |
Students assessed their own peers less critically than an unknown video presenter, consistent with possible friendship bias in authentic peer feedback |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — floris-m-van-blankenstein-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.