Claims

Peers have an essential role in promoting SDL through collaboration, motivation and support, though effects are mixed

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students were able to collaborate and engage with their peers, were motivated and supported by their peers, and learned from their experiences. → Ashleigh Finn 2025

Evidence

Ashleigh Finn 2025

Ashleigh Finn, Caitlin Fitzgibbon, Natalie Fonda, Cameron M Gosling. (2025). Self-directed learning and the student learning experience in undergraduate clinical science programs: a scoping review. Advances in Health Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10383-7

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review synthesised findings from 7 studies coded to the impact of peers theme and reports that "Students were able to collaborate and engage with their peers, were motivated and supported by their peers, and learned from their experiences".

"Students were able to collaborate and engage with their peers, were motivated and supported by their peers, and learned from their experiences"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.