Claims

Teacher-rated approaches to learning and math concepts and problem solving showed no differences between intervention and comparison children

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? No differences were found between conditions in teacher ratings on the Preschool Learning Behavior Scale or the Math Concepts and Problem Solving checklist (p > .05). → Silander 2016

Evidence

Silander 2016

Silander, M., Moorthy, S., Dominguez, X., Pasnik, S., & Llorente, C. (2016). Using Digital Media at Home to Promote Young Children's Mathematics Learning: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. SREE Spring 2016 Conference Abstract. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED567485

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Teacher rating scales (PLBS and the MCPS checklist) were administered at Weeks 1 and 12 and analyzed with multilevel models and item-level Wilcoxon/Mann-Whitney tests; no significant between-group differences were reported.

"No differences were found in teacher ratings of ATL or math concepts and problem solving between the two groups (p>.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.