Claims

Intervention parents were more likely than control parents to ask their child about revising for upcoming tests

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Of the measured parent outcomes, the only positive effect unlikely to have occurred by chance was intervention parents being more likely to ask their child about revising for upcoming tests. → Miller 2016

Evidence

Miller 2016

Miller, S., Davison, J., Yohanis, J., Sloan, S., Gildea, A. and Thurston, A. (2016). Texting Parents: Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581121

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Secondary parent-outcome analysis from telephone interviews collected by the project delivery team and linked to trial data by the evaluation team. The report identifies asking about revision as the sole parent outcome with a positive effect unlikely to have occurred by chance; no effect size is printed.

"the only positive effect that was unlikely to have occurred by chance was in relation to the likelihood of parents asking their child about revising for upcoming tests, where intervention parents were more likely to do so than control parents."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.