Claims

Texting parents about tests, homework and lesson content produced a small positive effect on maths attainment (ES 0.067) in a cluster RCT

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i0 Children whose parents received PEP texts experienced about one month of additional progress in maths compared to control children, a small positive effect (ES 0.067, 95% CI 0.041–0.092). → Miller 2016

Evidence

Miller 2016

Miller, S., Davison, J., Yohanis, J., Sloan, S., Gildea, A. and Thurston, A. (2016). Texting Parents: Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581121

q3 · i0 · causal · r2

Results table of a two-armed multi-site cluster randomised controlled trial (randomisation at Key Stage level) reporting the maths outcome for 5,613 analysed pupils: an effect size of "0.067" with confidence interval (0.041, 0.092), equivalent to about one month of additional progress.

"Maths 5,613 0.067 (0.041, 0.092) +1"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.