Claims

Per-exposure learning gains decrease as the number of exposures increases: a small but significant negative linear trend in the normalized incidental learning effect

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Normalized incidental learning effects (effect divided by number of exposures) showed a significant negative linear trend, with additional encounters contributing less learning as exposure count rose (ηp2 = .06). → Marie-Josée Bisson 2014

Evidence

Marie-Josée Bisson 2014

Marie-Josée Bisson, Walter J. B. van Heuven, Kathy Conklin, and Richard J. Tunney. (2014). The Role of Repeated Exposure to Multimodal Input in Incidental Acquisition of Foreign Language Vocabulary. Language Learning 64:4. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12085

q3 · i2 · causal · r2

ANOVAs on difference scores divided by exposure number (two through eight) in the translation recognition data revealed "a small but significant negative linear trend", ηp2 = .06 and ηp2 = .05; Pages and Jonckheere trend tests confirmed it (r = .25 and r = .20).

"The normalized incidental learning effects were then investigated using ANOV As, which revealed a small but significant negative linear trend, F1 (1, 65) = 3.98, p = .05, ηp2 = .06, F2 (1, 76) = 4.62, p < .05, ηp2 = .05"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id per-exposure-gains-decrease
title Per-exposure learning gains decrease as the number of exposures increases: a small but significant negative linear trend in the normalized incidental learning effect
description Per-exposure learning gains decrease as the number of exposures increases: a small but significant negative linear trend in the normalized incidental learning effect
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2014
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — marie-josée-bisson-2014

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.