Letter-writing difficulty varies widely across letters, with O easiest and K hardest, and knowing the letter name raises per-letter probabilities substantially¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? For the full sample, letter O had the highest probability of correct writing (.89) and letter K the lowest (.10). → Puranik Cynthia S. 2014
q3 i? For 4-year-olds, 22 of 26 letters showed probability increases of 20% or more when the letter name was known. → Puranik Cynthia S. 2014 (2)
Evidence¶
Puranik Cynthia S. 2014¶
Puranik Cynthia S., Petscher Yaacov, Lonigan Christopher J. (2014). Learning to Write Letters: Examination of Student and Letter Factors. Journal of experimental child psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.07.009
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Random effects from Models 1 and 2 converted to per-letter predicted probabilities for the full sample and by age group; 5-year-olds ranged from .63 (Z) to .99 (O).
"Probabilities in Table 6 reveal a range of difficulty for the full sample, with the letter O having the highest likelihood of being written correctly (predicted probability = .89) and the letter K having the lowest probability of being written correctly (predicted probability = .10)."
Puranik Cynthia S. 2014 (2)¶
Puranik Cynthia S., Petscher Yaacov, Lonigan Christopher J. (2014). Learning to Write Letters: Examination of Student and Letter Factors. Journal of experimental child psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.07.009
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Conditional per-letter probabilities (Table 7) computed from Model 2 random effects, comparing children who knew versus did not know each letter's name; 23 letters showed 20%-or-more increases for 5-year-olds.
"Fully 22 of the 26 letters had increases of 20% or more in the predicted probability for 4-year-olds when the name of the letter was known."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Alphabet Knowledge and Print Awareness — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Letter-name knowledge strongly predicts correct letter writing, especially for 4- and 5-year-olds — related
- Letter-sound knowledge and phonological awareness are associated with letter writing, but much less strongly than letter-name knowledge — related
- Letter type, letter order, textual frequency, number of strokes, and symmetry did not substantially or consistently contribute to letter writing — related
- Vowels were easier for 3- and 4-year-olds to write than CV letters — related
- The first letter of the child's name was the only letter-level factor consistently associated with correct letter writing — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
per-letter-difficulty-and-name-knowledge-gains |
title |
Letter-writing difficulty varies widely across letters, with O easiest and K hardest, and knowing the letter name raises per-letter probabilities substantially |
description |
Letter-writing difficulty varies widely across letters, with O easiest and K hardest, and knowing the letter name raises per-letter probabilities substantially |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2014 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — puranik-cynthia-s-2014, puranik-cynthia-s-2014-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.