Claims

Perceived instructor fluency, not instruction type, predicted students' feeling of learning (0.51 SD, P < 0.001)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Students who perceived the instructor as highly fluent reported feeling of learning more than half an SD (0.51) higher than those who perceived the instructor as disfluent (P < 0.001). → Deslauriers L. 2019

Evidence

Deslauriers L. 2019

Deslauriers L., McCarty L. S., Miller K., Callaghan K., Kestin G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Linear regression predicting feeling of learning from perceived instructor fluency in the same experiment. Students perceiving high fluency "reported more than half an SD (0.51) higher FOL" than those perceiving disfluency (P < 0.001); the article prints no standardized effect size for this finding.

"Students who perceived the instructor to be highly fluent, as measured by agreement with the statement “The instructor was effective at teaching,” reported more than half an SD (0.51) higher FOL compared with those who perceived the instructor as disfluent (P < 0.001)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id perceived-instructor-fluency-predicts-feeling-of-learning
title Perceived instructor fluency, not instruction type, predicted students' feeling of learning (0.51 SD, P < 0.001)
description Perceived instructor fluency, not instruction type, predicted students' feeling of learning (0.51 SD, P < 0.001)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — deslauriers-l-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.