Claims

Excessive perceived workload is positively associated with a surface approach and negatively with a deep approach to learning

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Many studies show excessive or inappropriate perceived workload is significantly positively associated with a surface approach and significantly negatively with a deep approach. → Baeten 2010 q2 i? Students perceiving an overload of information scored higher on the surface and lower on the deep approach. → Baeten 2010 (2)

Evidence

Baeten 2010

Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5, 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001

q2 · i? · review · r3

Narrative review synthesis of correlational studies on perceived workload and approaches to learning. The review reports the relationship is "significantly negative with a deep approach to learning" across multiple cited studies, with one study finding no significant relationship.

"Besides this study, many researchers have showed that an excessive perceived or inappropriate workload is positively associated at a significant level with a surface approach"

Baeten 2010 (2)

Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5, 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review reports a study focusing on information load rather than general perceived workload, reaching results analogous to the workload findings. Kember's explanation is that students resort to short cuts, i.e. the surface approach, to cope with excessive perceived demands.

"students who perceived an overload of information scored higher on the surface and lower on the deep approach"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id perceived-workload-surface-approach
title Excessive perceived workload is positively associated with a surface approach and negatively with a deep approach to learning
description Excessive perceived workload is positively associated with a surface approach and negatively with a deep approach to learning
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2010
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — baeten-2010, baeten-2010-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.