Claims

Per cent solved is a variable, not a constant unit of difficulty, and is not comparable across groups

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 1919 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Per cents state order of difficulty exactly but cannot establish exact amounts of difficulty, because increments of difficulty are unequal across the percent range and per cents lack a common unit comparable between groups. → Herring 1919

Evidence

Herring 1919

Herring, J. P. (1919). Derivation of a scale to measure abilities in scientific thinking. The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://psycnet.apa.org/journal/edu

q2 · i? · design · r2

Theoretical argument in the article's methodological section: per cents indicate the order of difficulty but are a variable unit, so they are safe to use only once their variations are determined. No effect size is printed.

"The percent has often been used to measure mental abilities just as if it were a constant unit. It is a variable, and as such, it can be used safely only when the amounts and effects of its variations have been determined."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id percent-variable-unit-not-constant
title Per cent solved is a variable, not a constant unit of difficulty, and is not comparable across groups
description Per cent solved is a variable, not a constant unit of difficulty, and is not comparable across groups
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 1919
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — herring-1919

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.