Perception measures of social distance, treatment amenability, perceived recidivism, and sentencing severity are mostly significantly intercorrelated¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Correlations among the dependent variables were mostly significant, ranging from -.241 to .667, with one weak non-significant exception. → Robles Chella 2026
Evidence¶
Robles Chella 2026¶
Robles Chella, Cheema Harleen, Buro Karen, Jung Sandy. (2026). Changing Language May Not Be Enough to Change Public Perceptions of Individuals Who Sexually Offend. Sexual Offending: Theory, Research, and Prevention. https://doi.org/10.5964/sotrap.17345
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Correlational analysis of the study's dependent measures (Ns = 232 to 295 per Table 1). "Correlations among the dependent variables are mostly significant and ranged from -.241 to .667"; the Social Distance Scale and treatment amenability full scale were not significantly correlated (r = -.059).
"Correlations among the dependent variables are mostly significant and ranged from -.241 to .667, as seen in Table 1, except for a weak to negligible non-significant correlation between the Social Distance Scale and the full scale of treatment amenability (r = -.059)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The interaction of label type and victim age did not significantly affect public perceptions of individuals who sexually offend — related
- The type of label used (person-first, 'sex offender', diagnostic, or offence-specific) does not significantly affect public perceptions of individuals who sexually offend — related
- Label type, victim age, and their interaction showed no significant effects on treatment amenability subscales (capacity to change, treatment ineffectiveness, incapacitation) — related
- Victim age (adult vs. child) did not significantly affect public perceptions in this vignette experiment, contrary to prior findings — related
- Modes of interdependence are weakly or negligibly intercorrelated across brokerage offices — related
- Prior evidence on whether labels change public perceptions of people with sexual offences is mixed, with some studies finding label effects and others finding none — related
- Zoo U subscales are intercorrelated in patterns the authors attribute to real-world overlap among social skills competencies — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
perception-measures-intercorrelations |
title |
Perception measures of social distance, treatment amenability, perceived recidivism, and sentencing severity are mostly significantly intercorrelated |
description |
Perception measures of social distance, treatment amenability, perceived recidivism, and sentencing severity are mostly significantly intercorrelated |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — robles-chella-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.