Self-assessed creative performance is slightly underestimated while self-assessed idea creativity is moderately overestimated¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q2·i0–i2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2028: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i0 Bias in self-assessed creative performance corresponds to a significant but very small underestimation (d = -0.19). → Lebuda 2025
q2 i2 Bias in self-assessed idea creativity corresponds to a significant moderate overestimation (d = 0.74). → Lebuda 2025 (2)
Evidence¶
Lebuda 2025¶
Lebuda, I., Hofer, G., & Benedek, M. (2025). Determinants of creative metacognitive monitoring: creativity, personality, and task-related predictors of self-assessed ideas and creative performance. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-025-09432-2
q2 · i0 · associational · r2
In the online study (N = 425), bias was computed by subtracting sample DT percentile from performance self-assessment; the article reports "a significant, but very small underestimation (d = -0.19, 95% BCa CI [-0.28, -0.09])".
"the bias in self-assessed creativity of performance corresponds to a significant, but very small underestimation (d = -0.19, 95% BCa CI [-0.28, -0.09])."
Lebuda 2025 (2)¶
Lebuda, I., Hofer, G., & Benedek, M. (2025). Determinants of creative metacognitive monitoring: creativity, personality, and task-related predictors of self-assessed ideas and creative performance. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-025-09432-2
q2 · i2 · associational · r2
Response-level bias was computed by subtracting external raters' creativity ratings from participants' self-ratings of their own ideas; the article reports "a significant, moderate overestimation (d = 0.74, 95% BCa CI [0.64, 0.84])".
"The bias in self-assessed creativity of ideas, however, corresponds to a significant, moderate overestimation (d = 0.74, 95% BCa CI [0.64, 0.84])."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Self-assessed creative performance and self-assessed idea creativity are moderately correlated but empirically distinct judgments
- Self-assessed creative performance correlates moderately with divergent thinking, but self-assessed idea creativity does not — related
- Higher divergent thinking, creative self-efficacy, creative self-concept, and task motivation predict more positive self-assessed creative performance — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
performance-underestimated-ideas-overestimated |
title |
Self-assessed creative performance is slightly underestimated while self-assessed idea creativity is moderately overestimated |
description |
Self-assessed creative performance is slightly underestimated while self-assessed idea creativity is moderately overestimated |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
recheck_by |
2028 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — lebuda-2025, lebuda-2025-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.