Claims

Self-assessed creative performance is slightly underestimated while self-assessed idea creativity is moderately overestimated

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q2 · i0–i2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2028: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i0 Bias in self-assessed creative performance corresponds to a significant but very small underestimation (d = -0.19). → Lebuda 2025 q2 i2 Bias in self-assessed idea creativity corresponds to a significant moderate overestimation (d = 0.74). → Lebuda 2025 (2)

Evidence

Lebuda 2025

Lebuda, I., Hofer, G., & Benedek, M. (2025). Determinants of creative metacognitive monitoring: creativity, personality, and task-related predictors of self-assessed ideas and creative performance. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-025-09432-2

q2 · i0 · associational · r2

In the online study (N = 425), bias was computed by subtracting sample DT percentile from performance self-assessment; the article reports "a significant, but very small underestimation (d = -0.19, 95% BCa CI [-0.28, -0.09])".

"the bias in self-assessed creativity of performance corresponds to a significant, but very small underestimation (d = -0.19, 95% BCa CI [-0.28, -0.09])."

Lebuda 2025 (2)

Lebuda, I., Hofer, G., & Benedek, M. (2025). Determinants of creative metacognitive monitoring: creativity, personality, and task-related predictors of self-assessed ideas and creative performance. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-025-09432-2

q2 · i2 · associational · r2

Response-level bias was computed by subtracting external raters' creativity ratings from participants' self-ratings of their own ideas; the article reports "a significant, moderate overestimation (d = 0.74, 95% BCa CI [0.64, 0.84])".

"The bias in self-assessed creativity of ideas, however, corresponds to a significant, moderate overestimation (d = 0.74, 95% BCa CI [0.64, 0.84])."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id performance-underestimated-ideas-overestimated
title Self-assessed creative performance is slightly underestimated while self-assessed idea creativity is moderately overestimated
description Self-assessed creative performance is slightly underestimated while self-assessed idea creativity is moderately overestimated
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
recheck_by 2028
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — lebuda-2025, lebuda-2025-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.