Claims

The Perry Beeches Coaching Programme had a positive impact on Year 7 pupils' reading, spelling and grammar attainment, equivalent to approximately five additional months' progress

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i1 In a four-school randomised controlled trial, intervention pupils scored significantly higher on the PiE Short Form than control pupils (Hedges' g = 0.36, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.52, p < 0.001). → Lord 2015

Evidence

Lord 2015

Lord, P., Bradshaw, S., Stevens, E. and Styles, B. (2015). Perry Beeches Coaching Programme: Evaluation report and Executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581144

q3 · i1 · causal · r2

Intention-to-treat analysis of a pupil-randomised controlled trial in four secondary schools, with 149 intervention and 142 control pupils in the model. Table 12 reports Hedges' g = 0.36, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.52, p < 0.001 on the PiE Short Form. The report describes this as "approximately five additional months' progress".

"The programme had a positive impact on pupils' attainment in reading, spelling and grammar, equivalent to approximately five additional months' progress."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.