Claims

Personalised instruction students differed significantly from non-personalised students on every individual attitude subscale, including lower anxiety and higher perceived male domain

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (3 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 3 of 3 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Univariate ANOVAs on post-treatment scores showed statistically significant differences between the personalised and non-personalised groups on each of the seven attitude subscales. → Awofala 2014 q2 i? Personalised students displayed less anxiety toward mathematics word problems than their non-personalised counterparts. → Awofala 2014 (2) q2 i? Personalised students perceived mathematics word problem as more of a male domain than non-personalised students, consistent with the sex-stereotyping criticism of personalisation. → Awofala 2014 (3)

Evidence

Awofala 2014

Awofala, A. O. A. (2014). Examining Personalisation of Instruction, Attitudes toward and Achievement in Mathematics Word Problems among Nigerian Senior Secondary School Students. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2(4), 273-288. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1059026

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Univariate ANOVA follow-ups to the MANOVA on post-treatment scores of the quasi-experiment (experimental n=183, control n=167). Table 3 reports F values of 8.21, 8.12, 14.11, 10.78, 7.92, 44.54 and 54.03 for the seven subscales, all significant at p<.05; no standardised effect sizes are printed in the quoted sentence.

"there was a statistically significant mean difference between the groups regarding self -confidence in learning mathematics word problem (p<.05), liking mathematics word problem (p<.05), usefulness of mathematics word problem (p<.05), anxiety towards mathematics word problem ( p<.05), motivation toward the learning of mathematics word problem (p<.05), context of mathematics word problem (p<.05) and mathematics word problem as a male domain (p<.05)."

Awofala 2014 (2)

Awofala, A. O. A. (2014). Examining Personalisation of Instruction, Attitudes toward and Achievement in Mathematics Word Problems among Nigerian Senior Secondary School Students. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2(4), 273-288. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1059026

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Authors' interpretation of the post-treatment means in the quasi-experiment: the experimental group's anxiety mean (2.64) was lower than the control group's (3.18) in Table 2, and 72.6% of experimental versus 28.7% of control students disagreed with the anxiety item quoted in the results text.

"More so, the personalised students displayed less anxiety towards mathematics word problem in comparison to their non -personalised counterparts."

Awofala 2014 (3)

Awofala, A. O. A. (2014). Examining Personalisation of Instruction, Attitudes toward and Achievement in Mathematics Word Problems among Nigerian Senior Secondary School Students. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2(4), 273-288. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1059026

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Authors' interpretation linking the higher male-domain post-treatment mean in the personalised group (3.12 vs 2.49) to the previously stated criticism that personalised contexts may be sex-stereotyped; the article cites Akinsola & Awofala (2009) and Wiest (2002) for this concern.

"The high perception of mathematics word problem as a male domain by the personalised group further gave credence to the finding that personalisation enhanced sex -stereotyped contexts that favour males and harm females’ achievement by drawing them into problems in distracting ways (Akinsola & Awofala, 2009 )"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.