Claims

The audio-visual and audio-only groups were homogeneous in general L2 proficiency before treatment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? PET scores did not differ significantly between groups (AV M=54.80, A M=54.35; t-test significance .615), so the groups were homogeneous in L2 proficiency. → Pooya Drood & Hanieh Davatgari Asl 2016

Evidence

Pooya Drood & Hanieh Davatgari Asl 2016

Pooya Drood & Hanieh Davatgari Asl. (2016). The Effects of Audio-visual Recorded and Audio Recorded Listening Tasks on the Accuracy of Iranian EFL Learners' Oral Production. English Language Teaching, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n9p110

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Independent samples t-test on PET scores of 20 learners per group, selected from 70 intermediate students scoring 50-60 out of 65; Levene's test (.263) verified equality of variances. The article concludes the groups are homogeneous.

"The mean score of the PET test in A V group is (54.80), and in A group is (54.35). Significance of the t-test was calculated, (.615)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.