Claims

Physical guidance reduces pointing error during low-vision navigation in older adults, indicating better spatial learning with a guide

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Older adults with simulated degraded vision showed significantly greater pointing error when walking unguided than when walking with a physical guide. → Barhorst-Cates Erica M. 2017

Evidence

Barhorst-Cates Erica M. 2017

Barhorst-Cates Erica M., Rand Kristina M., Creem-Regehr Sarah H. (2017). Let Me be Your Guide: Physical Guidance Improves Spatial Learning for Older Adults with Simulated Low Vision. Experimental Brain Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5063-8

q3 · i3 · causal · r1

Within-subjects experiment: 14 older adults (12 after outlier removal) walked real-world paths in simulated degraded vision, guided vs unguided. The 2x2 repeated-measures ANOVA found a significant guidance effect, "ηp2=.471", with unguided error M=36.58 vs guided M=26.71.

"Our analysis revealed a significant effect of guidance condition on pointing error F(1, 10)= 8.90, p<.02, ηp2=.471. Participants had significantly greater pointing error in the unguided condition (M=36.58, SE=4.90) compared to the guided condition (M=26.71, SE=3.53)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id physical-guide-improves-older-adult-low-vision-spatial-learning
title Physical guidance reduces pointing error during low-vision navigation in older adults, indicating better spatial learning with a guide
description Physical guidance reduces pointing error during low-vision navigation in older adults, indicating better spatial learning with a guide
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2017
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — barhorst-cates-erica-m-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.