No significant differences emerged among the four instructional groups on the oral production task, despite PI learners never producing the target form during instruction¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? On the oral production task, all four instructional groups scored significantly higher than the control group, and there were no statistically significant differences among the instructional groups at either posttest. → Adem Soruç 2017

Evidence¶

Adem Soruç 2017¶

Adem Soruç, Jingjing Qin, YouJin Kim. (2017). Comparing the Effectiveness of Processing Instruction and Production-Based Instruction on L2 Grammar Learning: The Role of Explicit Information. TESL Canada Journal/Revue TESL du Canada, 34(2), 49–70. http://dx.doi.org/1018806/tesl.v34i2.1262

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons following a 5 × 3 repeated measures ANOVA on oral production scores. The article reports all four instructional groups beat control (e.g., PI-EI vs control Mdiff = 3.40, p = .001) and "no statistically significant differences among the instructional groups".

"There were no statistically significant differences among the instructional groups on the oral production task."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• All four instructional groups (PI and PBI, with and without EI) outperformed the control group on the aural interpretation task at immediate and delayed posttests — related