Claims

No statistically significant gender differences in learning similar English letters were found on the post-test or follow-up test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Two-way ANCOVA showed no statistically significant effect of gender on post-test performance (F = 2.689, p = 0.086) or follow-up performance (F = 2.453, p = 0.138). → Maysoon A. Dakhiel & Mohammed O. Abu Al Rub 2017

Evidence

Maysoon A. Dakhiel & Mohammed O. Abu Al Rub 2017

Maysoon A. Dakhiel & Mohammed O. Abu Al Rub. (2017). The Effectiveness of Pictured Letters Mnemonics Strategy in Learning Similar English Language Letters among Students with Learning Disabilities. World Journal of Education, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v7n6p21

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Post-test ANCOVA in the 90-student quasi-experiment (45 male, 45 female, 15 of each per group): gender gave F = 2.689, p = 0.086; the follow-up ANCOVA gave F = 2.453, p = 0.138. No standardized effect size is printed for gender, so no magnitude is reported here.

"Table (5) shows that there were statistically significant differences of the teaching method, while there were no statistically significant differences due to gender nor interaction between them."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.