Claims

Coaching and pretest effects on PISA performance were studied separately for each content domain (reading and mathematics)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Coaching and pretest effects were analyzed separately for the reading and the mathematics content domains. → Brunner 2007

Evidence

Brunner 2007

Brunner, M.; Artelt, C.; Krauss, Stefan; Baumert, J. (2007). Coaching for the PISA test. Learning and Instruction 17 (2), S. 111-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.002

q3 · i? · causal · r?

Design statement from the abstract: the study used a "pre-/posttest quasi-experimental design" and examined coaching and pretest effects "for each content domain separately," covering the PISA reading and mathematics assessments.

"Coaching and pretest effects were studied for each content domain separately in a pre-/posttest quasi-experimental design."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id pisa-coaching-effects-studied-per-content-domain
title Coaching and pretest effects on PISA performance were studied separately for each content domain (reading and mathematics)
description Coaching and pretest effects on PISA performance were studied separately for each content domain (reading and mathematics)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2007
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — brunner-2007

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.