Claims

The PISG and PSGI script sequences showed no statistically significant differences on high- and low-level inquiry processes, with small effect sizes despite descriptive trends favoring PISG on high-level processes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Descriptively, the PISG sequence showed more occurrences of high-level generating evidence, evaluating evidence, and drawing conclusions than PSGI, but the differences were not statistically significant and effect sizes were small. → Esther Tan 2018

Evidence

Esther Tan 2018

Esther Tan (2018). Effects of two differently sequenced classroom scripts on common ground in collaborative inquiry learning. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9460-6

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Quantitative analysis of coded discourse from 20 groups (PISG n = 32, PSGI n = 29) across the three collaborative inquiry processes: "PISG script sequence facilitated more occurrences for high-level generation of evidence, high-level evaluation of evidence and high-level drawing of conclusions," but "there was no statistical significance and the effect sizes were small."

"overall descriptive findings showed that PISG script sequence facilitated more occurrences for high-level generation of evidence, high-level evaluation of evidence and high-level drawing of conclusions as compared to the PSGI script condition, again, there was no statistical significance and the effect sizes were small"

Esther Tan 2018 (2)

Esther Tan (2018). Effects of two differently sequenced classroom scripts on common ground in collaborative inquiry learning. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9460-6

q3 · i? · causal · r2

The same analysis on low-level inquiry processes found "the PISG script condition reduces the occurrences of all three low-level inquiry processes but the results were not significant"; no effect size value is printed in this sentence.

"Similarly, findings showed that the PISG script condition reduces the occurrences of all three low-level inquiry processes but the results were not significant."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id pisg-psgi-no-significant-inquiry-process-difference
title The PISG and PSGI script sequences showed no statistically significant differences on high- and low-level inquiry processes, with small effect sizes despite descriptive trends favoring PISG on high-level processes
description The PISG and PSGI script sequences showed no statistically significant differences on high- and low-level inquiry processes, with small effect sizes despite descriptive trends favoring PISG on high-level processes
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2018
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — esther-tan-2018, esther-tan-2018-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.