Claims

The evidence base for PjBL in kindergarten and elementary education is very small: eleven articles comprising 722 students aged 6 to 11

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The final review sample comprised eleven articles with data from 722 students, of whom 101 were kindergarten students and 621 were first- to sixth-grade students, with interventions lasting between 4 and 32 weeks. → Ferrero Marta 2021

Evidence

Ferrero Marta 2021

Ferrero Marta, Vadillo Miguel A., León Samuel P. (2021). Is project-based learning effective among kindergarten and elementary students? A systematic review. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249627

q2 · i? · review · r2

Descriptive summary of the eleven studies included in the systematic review (PRISMA search of Web of Science, PsycInfo and ERIC in January 2020). "the total sample consisted of 722 participants, aged between 6 and 11 years"; subjects covered included science, mathematics, or English.

"the total sample consisted of 722 participants, aged between 6 and 11 years. Among them, 101 were kindergarten students and 621 were first- to sixth-grade students. The interventions lasted between 4 and 32 weeks."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.