Claims

The two included studies on HOT both reported positive effects of P(j)BL on higher-order thinking

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the included PjBL study, HOT increased for the PjBL group but not for the control group across measurements. → Sofie M. M. Loyens 2023

Evidence

Sofie M. M. Loyens 2023

Sofie M. M. Loyens, Julianne E. van Meerten, Lydia Schaap, Lisette Wijnia. (2023). Situating Higher-Order, Critical, and Critical-Analytic Thinking in Problem- and Project-Based Learning Environments: A Systematic Review. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09757-x

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Independent-groups pre-post study (Sasson et al., 2018), n = 38 PjBL vs 27 control, summarized in the review's Table 4 on HOT; the review reports only the significance pattern, no effect size.

"HOT increased for the PjBL group but not for the control group from Measurement 1 (beginning 9th grade) to 3 (end of 10th grade; dependent t-tests)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id pjbl-hot-two-positive-studies
title The two included studies on HOT both reported positive effects of P(j)BL on higher-order thinking
description The two included studies on HOT both reported positive effects of P(j)BL on higher-order thinking
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-20
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — sofie-m-m-loyens-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.