In mathematics, personalized-learning students in the lowest baseline quintile were the most likely to out-grow their matched comparison students¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In mathematics, students in the lowest baseline quintile had the greatest proportion exceeding their comparison group's growth. → John F. Pane 2015
Evidence¶
John F. Pane 2015¶
John F. Pane, Elizabeth D. Steiner, Matthew D. Baird, Laura S. Hamilton. (2015). Continued Progress: Promising Evidence on Personalized Learning. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/t/RR1365z2 doi:10.7249/rr1365
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Quintile analysis (Chart 5) of the fraction of personalized learning students whose raw score growth exceeded their virtual comparison group's growth, by baseline score quintile in fall 2013.
"In every case, more than half of the personalized learning students had higher growth than their comparison students. In mathematics, students with the lowest baseline scores had the greatest proportion exceed the growth of their comparison students."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students in personalized learning schools made significantly greater mathematics and reading gains over two years than matched comparison students (effect sizes 0.27 mathematics, 0.19 reading) — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
pl-lowest-baseline-students-greatest-growth |
title |
In mathematics, personalized-learning students in the lowest baseline quintile were the most likely to out-grow their matched comparison students |
description |
In mathematics, personalized-learning students in the lowest baseline quintile were the most likely to out-grow their matched comparison students |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-14 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — john-f-pane-2015 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.