Claims

Planning shows no contribution to any level of narrative composition in fourth graders

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Planning did not significantly predict text length, syntactic complexity, or story content. → Drijbooms 2015

Evidence

Drijbooms 2015

Drijbooms, E., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2015). The contribution of executive functions to narrative writing in fourth grade children. Reading and Writing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9558-z

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Path analysis and regressions in 102 fourth graders; "The contribution of planning to the transcription and writing performance outcomes was not significant". Authors suggest planning develops late and the picture-elicitation task may reduce planning demands.

"The contribution of planning to the transcription and writing performance outcomes was not significant, so this EF was removed from the final model."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id planning-no-contribution-narrative-composition
title Planning shows no contribution to any level of narrative composition in fourth graders
description Planning shows no contribution to any level of narrative composition in fourth graders
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2015
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — drijbooms-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.