Claims

The planning-prompt effect on MOOC completion is largest for students enrolled in traditional schools

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q3
Currency · no dated study recorded · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The effect of planning prompts on course completion was largest for students enrolled in traditional schools, indicating the treatment's benefit varied across learner subgroups. → Yeomans 2017

Evidence

Yeomans 2017

Yeomans, Michael and Reich, Justin. 2017. "Planning Prompts Increase and Forecast Course Completion in Massive Open Online Courses." Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027416

q3 · i? · causal · r?

Moderator analysis of the natural field experiment in three HarvardX courses: the article states the prompt effect "was largest for students enrolled in traditional schools". No subgroup effect size or test statistic is printed, so no magnitude is coded.

"This effect was largest for students enrolled in traditional schools."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id planning-prompt-effect-larger-traditional-school-students
title The planning-prompt effect on MOOC completion is largest for students enrolled in traditional schools
description The planning-prompt effect on MOOC completion is largest for students enrolled in traditional schools
status review
evidence_strength moderate
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — yeomans-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.