Claims

Most interviewed HIL students perceived that effortfully replaying podcasts enhanced their learning

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The majority (67%) of interviewed students perceived that effortful engagement in repeatedly replaying podcast material enhanced their learning. → Sydney Enock Msonde 2017

Evidence

Sydney Enock Msonde 2017

Sydney Enock Msonde, Jan Van Aalst. (2017). Designing for interaction, thinking and academic achievement in a Tanzanian undergraduate chemistry course. Education Tech Research Dev (2017) 65:1389–1413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9531-4

q2 · i? · design · r3

Interviews with three students per section, selected to cover low, medium and high pre-test performance, conducted at the end of each unit. The article reports the 67% figure descriptively for interviewed students' perceptions of podcast replaying; no inferential test is reported.

"The majority (67%) of interviewed stu-dents perceived effortful engagement for repeatedly replaying of podcasts material enhanced their learning; others perceived the social interaction to be a new experience; and a few students felt that carrying out reflection was a new learning experience"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.