Claims

Retention trajectories diverged by centre: Centre 1 retained gains at 30 days while Centre 2 showed significant post-to-delayed decay

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the LMM, post-to-delayed change was significant only at Centre 2 (Holm-adjusted p = 0.033), while Centre 1 remained above baseline at delayed follow-up. → Joshi U 2026

Evidence

Joshi U 2026

Joshi U, Sarkar A, Shukla A, Shrimali S, Bezbaruah NK, B Sanjay Kini, Baisil S, Sheth Z, Bhargava P, Shah S. (2026). Ears for examinations: a multicentre quasi-experimental evaluation of AI-generated revision podcasts on learning outcomes and retention among medical students. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10080-6

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Primary linear mixed-effects model (TotalScore ~ Timepoint + Centre + Timepoint×Centre + (1|StudyID)) with Holm-adjusted planned contrasts; model-estimated means were 35.8 to 34.6 at Centre 1 versus 45.0 to 41.0 at Centre 2. No effect size printed for this contrast.

"Immediate pre–post gains were statistically clear in both centers (Holm-adjusted p < 0.001), while post–delayed change was significant only at Centre 2 (Holm-adjusted p = 0.033)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id podcast-retention-divergence-massed-vs-distributed
title Retention trajectories diverged by centre: Centre 1 retained gains at 30 days while Centre 2 showed significant post-to-delayed decay
description Retention trajectories diverged by centre: Centre 1 retained gains at 30 days while Centre 2 showed significant post-to-delayed decay
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
recheck_by 2029
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — joshi-u-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.