Retention trajectories diverged by centre: Centre 1 retained gains at 30 days while Centre 2 showed significant post-to-delayed decay¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: local conditions change quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the LMM, post-to-delayed change was significant only at Centre 2 (Holm-adjusted p = 0.033), while Centre 1 remained above baseline at delayed follow-up. → Joshi U 2026
Evidence¶
Joshi U 2026¶
Joshi U, Sarkar A, Shukla A, Shrimali S, Bezbaruah NK, B Sanjay Kini, Baisil S, Sheth Z, Bhargava P, Shah S. (2026). Ears for examinations: a multicentre quasi-experimental evaluation of AI-generated revision podcasts on learning outcomes and retention among medical students. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10080-6
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Primary linear mixed-effects model (TotalScore ~ Timepoint + Centre + Timepoint×Centre + (1|StudyID)) with Holm-adjusted planned contrasts; model-estimated means were 35.8 to 34.6 at Centre 1 versus 45.0 to 41.0 at Centre 2. No effect size printed for this contrast.
"Immediate pre–post gains were statistically clear in both centers (Holm-adjusted p < 0.001), while post–delayed change was significant only at Centre 2 (Holm-adjusted p = 0.033)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Long-Term Memory — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- AI-generated revision podcasts produce statistically significant immediate learning gains in medical students at both study centres — related
- Podcast gains extend beyond recall to higher-order application and analysis items at both centres — related
- Topic-wise gains were heterogeneous, with some topics showing no meaningful change — related
- Gains from an intensive period of second-language study persist for weeks without rehearsal. — a broader claim this one bears on
- Higher episode completion (>50%) is independently associated with greater learning gain, and the centre effect on gain is mediated by engagement — related
- Heterogeneous learning curves across practitioners create organizational challenges including perceived unfairness — related
- Exploratory pre-post questionnaire comparisons showed descriptively higher post-program means but no statistically significant differences after Holm adjustment — related
- VeriForge's integrated workflow is associated with higher one-week delayed recall of domain terms and a higher retention rate (exploratory) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
podcast-retention-divergence-massed-vs-distributed |
title |
Retention trajectories diverged by centre: Centre 1 retained gains at 30 days while Centre 2 showed significant post-to-delayed decay |
description |
Retention trajectories diverged by centre: Centre 1 retained gains at 30 days while Centre 2 showed significant post-to-delayed decay |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
recheck_by |
2029 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — joshi-u-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.