Claims

Students responded with polarised feedback to a redesigned technology-rich active-learning course, with almost a quarter disliking the flipped-video approach

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the redesigned course, almost a quarter of students disliked the flipped-video approach, with less than 15% expressing positive views. → McLay 2023 q2 i? Student feedback on the course was polarised: a moderate percentage of students loved the course while a corresponding percentage hated it. → McLay 2023 (2)

Evidence

McLay 2023

McLay, K. F., Thomasse, L., & Reyes, V. C., Jr. (2023). Embracing discomfort in active learning and technology-rich higher education settings: sensemaking through reflexive inquiry. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10192-6

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Reflexive snapshot reporting the first author's reading of SET data from the redesigned course: "almost a quarter disliked this approach, with less than 15% expressing positive views" toward the flipped short-video format.

"So, I was taken aback when student feedback data revealed that almost a quarter disliked this approach, with less than 15% expressing positive views."

McLay 2023 (2)

McLay, K. F., Thomasse, L., & Reyes, V. C., Jr. (2023). Embracing discomfort in active learning and technology-rich higher education settings: sensemaking through reflexive inquiry. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10192-6

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Snapshot from the ALPP sharing session comparing the team's feedback with other teams': the authors report "a vivid picture of polarisation" rather than uniformly negative or positive responses. No effect size is printed.

"However, our student feedback scores painted a vivid picture of polarisation. While a moderate percentage of our students seem to 'love' the course, another corresponding percentage apparently 'hated' it."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id polarised-student-feedback-technology-rich-active-learning-course
title Students responded with polarised feedback to a redesigned technology-rich active-learning course, with almost a quarter disliking the flipped-video approach
description Students responded with polarised feedback to a redesigned technology-rich active-learning course, with almost a quarter disliking the flipped-video approach
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — mclay-2023, mclay-2023-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.