Students responded with polarised feedback to a redesigned technology-rich active-learning course, with almost a quarter disliking the flipped-video approach¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · qualitativer2·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the redesigned course, almost a quarter of students disliked the flipped-video approach, with less than 15% expressing positive views. → McLay 2023
q2 i? Student feedback on the course was polarised: a moderate percentage of students loved the course while a corresponding percentage hated it. → McLay 2023 (2)
Evidence¶
McLay 2023¶
McLay, K. F., Thomasse, L., & Reyes, V. C., Jr. (2023). Embracing discomfort in active learning and technology-rich higher education settings: sensemaking through reflexive inquiry. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10192-6
q2 · i? · qualitative · r2
Reflexive snapshot reporting the first author's reading of SET data from the redesigned course: "almost a quarter disliked this approach, with less than 15% expressing positive views" toward the flipped short-video format.
"So, I was taken aback when student feedback data revealed that almost a quarter disliked this approach, with less than 15% expressing positive views."
McLay 2023 (2)¶
McLay, K. F., Thomasse, L., & Reyes, V. C., Jr. (2023). Embracing discomfort in active learning and technology-rich higher education settings: sensemaking through reflexive inquiry. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10192-6
q2 · i? · qualitative · r2
Snapshot from the ALPP sharing session comparing the team's feedback with other teams': the authors report "a vivid picture of polarisation" rather than uniformly negative or positive responses. No effect size is printed.
"However, our student feedback scores painted a vivid picture of polarisation. While a moderate percentage of our students seem to 'love' the course, another corresponding percentage apparently 'hated' it."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The nine AI demonstrations drew high attendance but modest engagement, with student feedback sharply split on course utility — related
- Low-performing students tended to procrastinate more on graded problem-solving exercises and on video watching with formative MCQs — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
polarised-student-feedback-technology-rich-active-learning-course |
title |
Students responded with polarised feedback to a redesigned technology-rich active-learning course, with almost a quarter disliking the flipped-video approach |
description |
Students responded with polarised feedback to a redesigned technology-rich active-learning course, with almost a quarter disliking the flipped-video approach |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — mclay-2023, mclay-2023-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.