Teachers use the portal primarily to search for and download material rather than to share or upload it¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Usage logs show far more downloads than uploads, and this disparity increases from T1 to T2. → Pynoo 2012
Evidence¶
Pynoo 2012¶
Pynoo, B., Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Duyck, W., Sijnave, B. & Duyck, P. (2012). Teachers' acceptance and use of an educational portal. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1308-1317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.026
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Paired t-tests on portal log data from 864 teachers compared usage at T1 and T2. The results section reports that "teachers downloaded significantly more (t(863) = -5.528, p<.001), while they uploaded significantly less (t(863) = 2.529, p=.01)."
"Table 2 shows a great disparity between the average number of downloads and uploads at both times. This difference even increases from T1 to T2: teachers downloaded significantly more (t(863) = -5.528, p<.001), while they uploaded significantly less (t(863) = 2.529, p=.01)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Teachers become more efficient in searching the portal over time, and most use it more frequently — related
- Portal users can be classified into four types (new, light, medium, heavy) based on observed usage parameters — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.