Claims

Adult ESL treatment participants reacted positively to graded readers and scaffolded silent reading, reporting perceived vocabulary and comprehension growth

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? All treatment participants said they liked the graded readers for their variety of topics and levels, and all but one self-reported improved vocabulary and reading comprehension. → Martinez 2017

Evidence

Martinez 2017

Liza E. Martinez. (2017). Adult Hispanic ESL Students and Graded Readers. The CATESOL Journal, 29(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1164286

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Qualitative findings from journals, reading logs, and interviews with four treatment participants over the 14-week study. The article reports all but one participant gave positive self-reports of growth; one self-identified nonreader said his view of reading stayed the same.

"All of the participants said they like the graded readers because of the variety of topics and levels. They did not find the graded readers difficult or boring."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.