Positive coping styles show larger coefficients than negative coping styles, suggesting improving positive coping strategies may be more beneficial than minimising negative ones¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr2–r3·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Within the personal disposition domain, coefficients for positive coping styles were larger than those for negative coping styles. → Ball 2025
q2 i? Maladaptive cognitive and coping strategies were identified as risk factors, while detached coping was identified as an adaptive, protective strategy. → Ball 2025 (2)
Evidence¶
Ball 2025¶
Ball, I., Banerjee, M., Holliman, A., & Tyndall, I. (2025). Investigating Success in the Transition to University: A Systematic Review of Personal Risk and Protective Factors Influencing Psychosocial Success. https://osf.io/vxu5q?view_only=ee23e20f57c54891b842c92b7a4858de
q2 · i? · review · r2
Narrative synthesis of the personal disposition domain (Table A1) across the retained longitudinal studies; the review compares coefficients for positive versus negative coping styles and finds the positive larger. No specific coefficients are printed for this comparison.
"the coefficients for the positive coping styles were larger their negative counterparts, suggesting that it would be more beneficial to improve positive coping strategies rather than focus on minimising negative ones"
Ball 2025 (2)¶
Ball, I., Banerjee, M., Holliman, A., & Tyndall, I. (2025). Investigating Success in the Transition to University: A Systematic Review of Personal Risk and Protective Factors Influencing Psychosocial Success. https://osf.io/vxu5q?view_only=ee23e20f57c54891b842c92b7a4858de
q2 · i? · review · r3
Within the personal disposition synthesis, the review reports that engaging in maladaptive cognitive and coping strategies is a risk factor while adaptive self-regulation skills are protective; detached coping is singled out as adaptive. No effect size is printed.
"Interestingly, detached coping was identified as an adaptive strategy and a protective factor to success"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Affect Regulation — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- A systematic review of 32 longitudinal studies identified 96 personal risk and protective factors for psychosocial transition success, consolidated into 16 salient elements across five higher-order domains — a broader claim this one bears on
- In the whole sample, preference for self-disclosure with AI chatbots is associated with higher adaptive coping and lower maladaptive coping, linking to more prosocial behavior and less bullying — related
- The correlates of self-disclosure preference with AI chatbots diverge culturally: positive with adaptive coping in HK but not the US, and positively associated with maladaptive coping in the US but negatively in HK — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
positive-coping-coefficients-larger-than-negative |
title |
Positive coping styles show larger coefficients than negative coping styles, suggesting improving positive coping strategies may be more beneficial than minimising negative ones |
description |
Positive coping styles show larger coefficients than negative coping styles, suggesting improving positive coping strategies may be more beneficial than minimising negative ones |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — ball-2025, ball-2025-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.