Most students held favorable attitudes toward pictorial-aids instruction¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q1
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? 75% of students liked the pictorial-aids lesson plans and about 80% found teachers should use pictorial aids, though a minority preferred traditional methods. → Afraz 2018
Evidence¶
Afraz 2018¶
Afraz, S., Taghizade, L., & Taghinezhad, A. (2018). The Usefulness of Pictorial Aids in Developing Female Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Speaking Proficiency. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.1p.38
q1 · i? · causal · r2
Ten-item questionnaire (three closed-ended) on student perceptions; Table 6 reports 75% liked the technique, 80% saw a need for teachers to use pictorial aids, and only 35% said pictorial aids were used frequently in their classrooms.
"Table 5 shows that most of the students like the technique used in the class during these three weeks of intervention. However, 25% did not like the technique. They were in fa -vor of traditional methods of teaching."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Student participation in speaking discussions increased after pictorial aids were introduced — related
- Students and teachers respond favorably to embedded aids: approximately 90% of students reported no difficulty understanding or using the aids, and over 75% wanted similar aids throughout the book. — related
- Chinese college EFL learners held strongly favorable attitudes toward a multimedia vocabulary application, with more than 80% reacting positively — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.