Claims

Students and teachers expressed predominantly positive opinions about the guides and activities, with time pressure the main teacher criticism

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? 92.3% of surveyed experimental-group students said there was no activity they did not like, and biodiversity observation in the garden was the most-liked activity. → Elif Ozata Yucel 2015 q2 i? Teachers judged the guides clear and appropriate, but criticized time problems and insufficient revision in activity sheets. → Elif Ozata Yucel 2015 (2)

Evidence

Elif Ozata Yucel 2015

Elif Ozata Yucel, Muhlis Ozkan. (2015). Development and Implementation of an Instructional Design for Effective Teaching of Ecosystem, Biodiversity, and Environmental Issues. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.4.2579

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Lesson Evaluation Form responses from 72 experimental-group students. "92.3% said that there was no activity they did not like. The activity students liked most was biodiversity observation in the garden (25.2%)", followed by documentaries/animations (20%) and the pollution experiment (17%).

"Of the 72 experimental group students who were asked to express their opinions via the LEF , 92.3% said that there was no activity they did not like. The activity students liked most was biodiversity observation in the garden (25.2%)."

Elif Ozata Yucel 2015 (2)

Elif Ozata Yucel, Muhlis Ozkan. (2015). Development and Implementation of an Instructional Design for Effective Teaching of Ecosystem, Biodiversity, and Environmental Issues. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.4.2579

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Material Evaluation Form responses from two teachers. "Both of the teachers who were asked to express their opinions via the MEF stated that the prepared guides were clear, understandable, and appropriate to the levels of the students"; negative opinions concerned time problems and activity-sheet revision.

"Both of the teachers who were asked to express their opinions via the MEF stated that the prepared guides were clear, understandable, and appropriate to the levels of the students in terms of language and expression."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.