Claims

After the forming experiment, the share of senior pupils at a high level of environmental education rose from 10% to 25%

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Control-phase re-testing of the same 215 pupils showed 25% high, 59% middle and 16% low levels of environmental education, which the authors read as confirming their hypothesis. → Sadykova et al. 2014

Evidence

Sadykova et al. 2014

Aida G. Sadykova, Marianna E. Yashina & Luiza R. Zakirova. (2014). Implementing Environmental Culture in the Language Learning Laboratory. English Language Teaching, 7(12). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n12p85

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Control-phase cross-section test of the same 215 pupils reported in Table 2: 25% high, 59% middle, 16% low, against the Table 1 baseline of 10%/42%/48%. The authors report "a significant shift of emphasis in the understanding by schoolchildren the essence of the environmental education signs".

"Table 2. Levels of the environmental education of senior pupils in the end of the experiment Number of children H (high) M (middle) L (low) 215 25% 59% 16%"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.