After working with the script, students improved their individual task representation of high-level tasks and their strategy reflection¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Students improved in determining a correct task representation of high-level tasks and in reflecting on the most appropriate reading strategy after working with the collaboration script. → Kielstra 2022
Evidence¶
Kielstra 2022¶
Kielstra, J., Molenaar, I., van Steensel, R., & Verhoeven, L. (2022). 'Supporting socially shared regulation during collaborative task‑oriented reading'. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 17, 65–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-022-09365-x
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Pre-test/post-test intervention design; a paired-samples t-test compared individual task representation, strategy selection and strategy reflection before and after four script-supported lessons; 38 students were included after attendance-based exclusions. No control group was used.
"However, after working with the script, students did improve their ability to determine a correct representation of a high-level task and to reflect on the most appropriate reading strategy for these tasks."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The 'Y-read?' collaboration script elicited mainly low-level metacognitive regulation during pre- and post-task discussions, with deep-level activities rare — related
- Video-modeling of collaboration, especially with prompted reflection, produced more lasting learning about collaboration than scripted practice once script supports were withdrawn — related
- Reflection interventions in higher education have a medium positive average effect on learning that varies with duration, peer interaction and the reflective activity used — a broader claim this one bears on
- Neither the external collaboration script nor the reflection scaffold increased the quality of interaction in the subsequent (testing-phase) collaboration — related
- Computer-supported collaborative learning with simulation programs fostered conceptual change for students who were cognitively engaged and prepared to reflect on and reconstruct their conceptions — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
post-script-improvement-task-representation-strategy-reflection |
title |
After working with the script, students improved their individual task representation of high-level tasks and their strategy reflection |
description |
After working with the script, students improved their individual task representation of high-level tasks and their strategy reflection |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — kielstra-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.