After training, prospective teachers caught up with current faculty in reasoning but still had lower noticing scores¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Post-test Mann–Whitney U-tests revealed no statistical differences between groups in professional vision or reasoning scores, but prospective teachers still had lower noticing scores (Z = −1.985, p = 0.047). → Heinonen 2023
Evidence¶
Heinonen 2023¶
Heinonen, N., Katajavuori, N., Murtonen, M., & Södervik, I. (2023). Short pedagogical training in supporting university teachers' professional vision: A comparison of prospective and current faculty teachers. Instructional Science, 51, 201–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09603-7
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Post-test group comparison after the six-week course (n = 64). The study reports "prospective teachers had caught up with current faculty in their reasoning capability during the course, but not in the noticing skills."
"However, prospective teachers still received lower noticing scores compared to current faculty after the course (Z = −1.985, p = 0.047). Thus, prospective teachers had caught up with current faculty in their reasoning capability during the course, but not in the noticing skills."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Statistical Reasoning — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- After training, better professional vision and reasoning are correlated with more learning-centered conception changes and fewer misconceptions — related
- Before pedagogical training, prospective university teachers have lower professional vision scores than current faculty teachers — related
- Reasoning scores of both prospective and current faculty teachers increased significantly during the short pedagogical training, but noticing did not improve significantly in either group — related
- Prospective teachers notice fewer pedagogically significant incidents than current faculty teachers before training — related
- Prospective teachers hold more misconceptions about teaching and learning than current faculty both before and after training, and misconceptions decreased only among current faculty — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
posttest-group-differences-reasoning-noticing |
title |
After training, prospective teachers caught up with current faculty in reasoning but still had lower noticing scores |
description |
After training, prospective teachers caught up with current faculty in reasoning but still had lower noticing scores |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — heinonen-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.